<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7270489</id><updated>2009-02-26T14:18:06.252-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Citizen Control</title><subtitle type='html'></subtitle><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7270489/posts/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.wiltschko.org/bill/billsblog/'/><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.wiltschko.org/bill/billsblog/atom.xml'/><author><name>Bill</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06972873000303366221</uri><email>bill.wiltschko@gmail.com</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>10</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7270489.post-5587174645837596660</id><published>2009-02-25T10:13:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-25T10:49:50.457-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California Constitutional Convention'/><title type='text'>California Constitutional Convention "Summit"</title><summary type='text'>The California Constitutional Convention (CCC) "Summit" yesterday in Sacramento was revealing on several levels.  First, as Joe Mathews has already stated, the politicians in attendance pleaded for inclusion as Convention Delegates.  The most persuasive argument for not including them was that voters wouldn't trust such a convention and would vote down the initiative calling the convention.  A </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7270489/5587174645837596660/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7270489&amp;postID=5587174645837596660' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7270489/posts/default/5587174645837596660'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7270489/posts/default/5587174645837596660'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.wiltschko.org/bill/billsblog/2009/02/california-constitutional-convention.html' title='California Constitutional Convention &quot;Summit&quot;'/><author><name>Bill</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06972873000303366221</uri><email>bill.wiltschko@gmail.com</email></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7270489.post-3005732155590527223</id><published>2009-02-21T12:33:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-21T12:40:35.276-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California Constitutional Convention'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Citizens Legislature'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Citizens Assembly'/><title type='text'>Continuous Referendum Assembly</title><summary type='text'>The founders of our country were fully aware of the excesses of legislatures, but they were able to blunt only a few of them.  They intended the three branches of government to check each other, reducing possible overreach by legislators and the executive (the judiciary was “the least dangerous branch”).  California and other states have this three-part government structure.   We know well today </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7270489/3005732155590527223/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7270489&amp;postID=3005732155590527223' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7270489/posts/default/3005732155590527223'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7270489/posts/default/3005732155590527223'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.wiltschko.org/bill/billsblog/2009/02/continuous-referendum-assembly.html' title='Continuous Referendum Assembly'/><author><name>Bill</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06972873000303366221</uri><email>bill.wiltschko@gmail.com</email></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7270489.post-115058763673454362</id><published>2006-06-17T16:33:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-06-17T16:40:36.753-07:00</updated><title type='text'>The Failure of Checks and Balances</title><summary type='text'>Our constitution uses three branches and checks and balances between them to prevent tyranny. While all members of all branches take an oath to uphold the constitution, they also have specific powers that they alone exercise and specific powers to restrain the other branches. We have elites checking and balancing other elites. We'll define elites in more detail later.The constitution also </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7270489/115058763673454362/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7270489&amp;postID=115058763673454362' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7270489/posts/default/115058763673454362'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7270489/posts/default/115058763673454362'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.wiltschko.org/bill/billsblog/2006/06/failure-of-checks-and-balances.html' title='The Failure of Checks and Balances'/><author><name>Bill</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06972873000303366221</uri><email>bill.wiltschko@gmail.com</email></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7270489.post-114763043810933141</id><published>2006-05-14T09:30:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2006-05-14T11:13:58.113-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Poverty-level income is irrelevant</title><summary type='text'>Poverty has been defined as income below a certain amount for several decades. Several commentators have pointed out that despite rising GDP and per capita income, the number of those in poverty has changed little. This essay will concern how our policies have perpetuated poverty in fact, leaving aside whether we have perpetuated poverty by the current widely-used, income-based definition. The </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7270489/114763043810933141/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7270489&amp;postID=114763043810933141' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7270489/posts/default/114763043810933141'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7270489/posts/default/114763043810933141'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.wiltschko.org/bill/billsblog/2006/05/poverty-level-income-is-irrelevant_14.html' title='Poverty-level income is irrelevant'/><author><name>Bill</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06972873000303366221</uri><email>bill.wiltschko@gmail.com</email></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7270489.post-114763021453986100</id><published>2006-05-14T09:30:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-05-14T11:10:15.996-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Poverty-level income is irrelevant</title><summary type='text'>Poverty has been defined as income below a certain amount for several decades.  Several commentators have pointed out that despite rising GDP and per capita income, the number of those in poverty has changed little.  This essay will concern how our policies have perpetuated poverty in fact, leaving aside whether we have perpetuated poverty by the current widely-used, income-based definition.  The</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7270489/114763021453986100/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7270489&amp;postID=114763021453986100' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7270489/posts/default/114763021453986100'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7270489/posts/default/114763021453986100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.wiltschko.org/bill/billsblog/2006/05/poverty-level-income-is-irrelevant.html' title='Poverty-level income is irrelevant'/><author><name>Bill</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06972873000303366221</uri><email>bill.wiltschko@gmail.com</email></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7270489.post-114038531553588764</id><published>2006-02-19T12:50:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-02-19T15:52:46.106-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Federalist 51</title><summary type='text'>Federalist 51 is where Madison said, "If men were angels, no government would be necessary."In the very next paragraph, he says, "In framing a government that is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed, and in the next place, force it to control itself."The great difficulty indeed. We have proof, after 200</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7270489/114038531553588764/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7270489&amp;postID=114038531553588764' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7270489/posts/default/114038531553588764'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7270489/posts/default/114038531553588764'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.wiltschko.org/bill/billsblog/2006/02/federalist-51.html' title='Federalist 51'/><author><name>Bill</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06972873000303366221</uri><email>bill.wiltschko@gmail.com</email></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7270489.post-111628901788952662</id><published>2005-05-16T17:08:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-02-18T16:00:17.490-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Section 2 of 21st amendment deleted</title><summary type='text'>"The transportation or importation into any State, Territory, or possession of the United States for delivery or use therein of intoxicating liquors, in violation of the laws thereof, is hereby prohibited."The 21st amendment couldn't be clearer. It is specific to alcohol and specific to state vs federal context.I like the result of today's 5-4 decision, because I would prefer the freest possible </summary><link rel='related' href='http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;cid=514&amp;e=6&amp;u=/ap/20050516/ap_on_go_su_co/scotus_wine_shipments' title='Section 2 of 21st amendment deleted'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7270489/posts/default/111628901788952662'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7270489/posts/default/111628901788952662'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.wiltschko.org/bill/billsblog/2005/05/section-2-of-21st-amendment-deleted.html' title='Section 2 of 21st amendment deleted'/><author><name>Bill</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06972873000303366221</uri><email>bill.wiltschko@gmail.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7270489.post-111568774606831017</id><published>2005-05-09T17:33:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-02-25T09:18:47.737-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The entitlement society</title><summary type='text'>Leon Panetta wrote an opinion piece for the Monterey Herald this weekend under the title, "Where is the battle for ideas?" He suggested framing the left vs right debate in terms of five dualities, such as "Protect 'Guaranteed Benefits' vs. 'Private Accounts' for social security. As long as promised benefits grow faster than GNP grows, there WILL be an (unhappy) end to this short-sightedness.His </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.montereyherald.com/mld/montereyherald/news/opinion/11596247.htm' title='The entitlement society'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7270489/111568774606831017/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7270489&amp;postID=111568774606831017' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7270489/posts/default/111568774606831017'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7270489/posts/default/111568774606831017'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.wiltschko.org/bill/billsblog/2005/05/entitlement-society.html' title='The entitlement society'/><author><name>Bill</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06972873000303366221</uri><email>bill.wiltschko@gmail.com</email></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7270489.post-111505847085393963</id><published>2005-05-02T11:21:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-05-02T11:27:50.856-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Keyword test</title><summary type='text'>Let's check out how well keywords are found.  eDrama Learning is the company I founded in 1998 to build an (emotion and) conversation simulator.  We designed about 20 characters that represent customer service challenges and present those characters to the learner.  The learner types what s/he wants to say to the character (customer), who replies with both text and body language and facial </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.edrama.com' title='Keyword test'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7270489/111505847085393963/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7270489&amp;postID=111505847085393963' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7270489/posts/default/111505847085393963'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7270489/posts/default/111505847085393963'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.wiltschko.org/bill/billsblog/2005/05/keyword-test.html' title='Keyword test'/><author><name>Bill</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06972873000303366221</uri><email>bill.wiltschko@gmail.com</email></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7270489.post-108689743493825988</id><published>2004-06-10T12:45:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2004-06-10T12:57:14.936-07:00</updated><title type='text'>News..</title><summary type='text'>Nothing much new here. Kids are out of school and lounging. Alex isn't quite, actually. He and two of his friends are pursuing an idea that invoves designing a new symbol language for plotting brain function based on both brain physiology as we know it and some concepts from psychology. It's part of 'neural sceince' which appears to be a very new field of research because, 1) there are 'schools </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7270489/108689743493825988/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7270489&amp;postID=108689743493825988' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7270489/posts/default/108689743493825988'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7270489/posts/default/108689743493825988'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.wiltschko.org/bill/billsblog/2004/06/news.html' title='News..'/><author><name>Dave W.</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry></feed>
